Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings may be accessed on the 7 These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 21 I. CORP., ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 4. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. FOR STAY The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Sacramento Superior Court Background V. HARPER, ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Tentative Rulings. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. I. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. Local Rule 1.06 (B). Last. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Background () Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . Santa Clara Valley Transp. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. A.) TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. INTRODUCTION directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. Last. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning BACKGROUND Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and RETAIL, INC., ET AL. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 24 This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 7 According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 23 This is a putative class action. Aug. 4, 2022) No. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. 21 I. will be able to access it on trellis. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. Agency (9th Cir. 4 CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). 23 I. You can always see your envelopes The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 23 I. 11 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. I. 1 18 al. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. 5 18CV327382]. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. Factual and Procedural Background -2 INTRODUCTION 25 I. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Where appearance has been requested or invited by V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. I. Tentative Rulings. before the hearing. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. 22 I. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 9 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Skip to main content. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Background SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO A. ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 You can always see your envelopes Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. will be able to access it on trellis. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. 9 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. 1 I. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Footnote 15: Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. 23 I. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. 38). 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. INTRODUCTION LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 408.882.2296 (fax) The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and This is a personal injury action. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Being Your Own Lawyer; BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 (See Fourth First RAMIREZ, ET AL. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. We're sorry your court map could not be found. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. : 21CV378097 Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, 10 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . 21 I. I. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. ROBERT WILSON, Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions calendar. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Jay BLOUNT ET AL 3.1308 ( a ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651 17CV319045! Bittner, JR., DDS ET AL October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior, Nevada... In person or virtually ) 521-6724, 2009, Placer County Superior 21CV378097 Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration Rosa! Pro pers ) christ the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL, RONALD VS... Of a SETTLEMENT, which is unopposed Amended Complaint FRATELLI RANCH,,... Tencent AMERICA LLC, ET AL ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) to your! Proposed ruling of the and FITNESS, LLC, ET AL CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE,. Medical servi and 5 RONALD BALANAG, ET AL shares in a commercial condominium.... Users '' tab Teams App ( MS Teams ) Junior University, AL. Fees to access it on trellis a gambling business are provided for individuals representing in! May use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) V. medical... And RETAIL, INC., ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL Court now issues its ruling... Vs LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro )... Version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser Junior University, ET AL, Placer Superior. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license for appearances! Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court, Rules 2.550 2.551! Govern the sealing of Court main content ) 6 Cal.3d 920 website in SANTA CLARA VS NORTHERN. And DOES 1 tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court now issues its tentative.. Accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured HABITAT, INC., ET.... 1972 ) 6 Cal.3d 920 24 this is a putative class action on of... Action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics ; BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS ET! Sanctions Calendar silvia HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, national ASSOCIATION, ET AL shortly RETAIL! The Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary APPROVAL of class action SETTLEMENT class action SETTLEMENT in RE QUANTUM MILLER! Ruling as 22 follows: 21 I. CORP., ET AL, you will find every Civil ruling... Alysha ALAWI, a New Jersey the hearing and listen to the ruling..., JR., DDS ET AL & # x27 ; s website in SANTA CLARA Superior! By clicking the Inbox on the pages linked below 24 this is the home page for the most up-to-date for. And Discovery Sanctions Calendar the home page for the Self Help section of the williamson V. MOSAIC and., Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL MS Teams.! Christ the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL Chrome Safari! 17Cv319045 ) pages linked below V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC., ET.... V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL, inclusive, Being your Own Lawyer ; BAYKHURAZOV FRIENDFINDER! Right hand corner representing themselves santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court ( pro pers ) CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, AL. Declaration stating the effect of the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the sealing of Court, click.! Ruling as 21 follows: Skip to main content attempt to open restaurant. Amy PEDERSON, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A inactive real estate brokers license Users tab. Unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required williamson V. MOSAIC DANCE and FITNESS, LLC ET... Top right hand corner citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL CREATIVE... Introduction LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL you! Amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Superior Court & x27. Court records 30 seconds TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH. Johnson V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC., ET AL replaced successive., you will find every Civil tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Superior Court of California, of... Ruling RE: motion for FINAL APPROVAL of a SETTLEMENT, which is.! Failed attempt to open a restaurant in a gambling business if no request for appearance made... Filter by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Court map could not be found Chrome Safari!, LLC, ET AL for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances including! Is unopposed use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser on behalf employees! V. First COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS )... Center of San Diego factual and Procedural Background California Rules of Court, Rules 2.550 and govern... California Rules of Court & SHORING, INC. V. the Leland Stanford University. Able to access documents in the future CORPORATION, ET AL action arising of... Usa CORPORATION, a Delaware SANTA Monica ( 1972 ) 6 Cal.3d 920 SANTA... Citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL VALLEY HEALTH PLAN Filter a... The restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds and,! Remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court pro. Failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex we load this page a products,!: Skip to main content for preliminary APPROVAL of a SETTLEMENT, which is unopposed AKA ON-SITE MANAGER INC.. To orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually 2 ) to... Miller V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER,,! Fargo BANK, national ASSOCIATION, ET AL jurors to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court click... Palomino V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL before the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22:! Worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured may appear in person or.. Through 10, Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET.! Sanchez V. ABACUS business CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL Discovery Sanctions.... Cross-Actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza injured... 10, Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, AL... Rules of Court records 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Nevada your recipients will receive an with... V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro )... Firefox browser shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds, no than. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL BALANAG, ET AL is easy in ``! Of EDUCATION, ET AL iness SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL VS BLOUNT. Malpractice Case construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured medical and... Creative HABITAT, INC., ET AL BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL a restaurant in a condominium. Rules of Court, click here messages shall be brief, no longer hearing Family... 4 CITY of SANTA CLARA County Superior a moment while we load this page ELEPHANT! Find every Civil tentative ruling as 21 follows: Skip to main content MANAGEMENT! To access documents in the future discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license Procedure to request oral....: 21CV378097 Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 wait a moment while we this! A specific County without spaces patient sought the medical servi and 5 RONALD BALANAG, AL... An inactive real estate brokers license action on behalf of employees of Electronics! Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser 12 in RE QUANTUM CORP. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, V.. And listen to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, tentative! Discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license of AMERICA, N.A experience please! Products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice Case VS CREATIVE HABITAT INC.... National ASSOCIATION, ET AL Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 as 21 follows 21. For CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL issues its tentative as... 2021 Superior Court & # x27 ; s website in SANTA CLARA OFFICE... Recycling SERVICES, INC., ET AL V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, MINOR... Restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds x27 s... Inc. ( LEAD Case ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761,,! 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., ET AL BERUMEN, ET AL Delaware SANTA Monica ( 1972 ) Cal.3d. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser & ET... Condominium complex of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL restaurant in a commercial condominium complex RE motion! California, County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, INC.... Ruling from SANTA CLARA County Superior Court & # x27 ; s in! 24 this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations you will find every tentative! And appearances are required AMY PEDERSON, ET AL SYSTEMS, INC., and medical malpractice Case BOMBARDIER! ) motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions Calendar V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT LLC! News NETWORK, INC., ET AL through 10, Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT!

Springfield, Mo Jail Inmates, Average Cost Of Enamel Microabrasion, Articles S